Posts Tagged ‘John Henry’

Former Sox Pitcher Curt Schilling Adds Fuel to the Fire

Anyone who read my last post knows exactly how I feel about the Red Sox ownership and their recent turmoil. Monday afternoon, former Red Sox great Curt Schilling decided that there wasn’t enough fuel in this fire, so he added more. Curt Schilling appeared on 98.5 the Sports Hub, and the now infamous Felger & Massarotti afternoon segment when he said, “…he’s [John Henry] full of ****.” Strong words to say the least from the former Sox, but not uncharted waters for Schilling. Almost a week ago now on October 12, Schilling, while on national TV on ESPN’s Baseball Tonight, said, “These [owners] are some bad people.” That is a very big accusation to make, not just about the organization, but about the character of the owners. Schilling is saying that the 3 owners, Tom Werner, Larry Lucchino, and John Henry, are not good human beings; that there is something morally wrong with them. Could this just be the ramblings of a bitter man, after arguing with the Sox when he hurt his shoulder in 2008 after signing a 1 year $8 million contract? Perhaps. Yet again, Schilling would know exactly how the Red Sox organization operates after spending 4 years there and winning 2 World Series. This brings us to Monday afternoon.

Schilling was a special guest on the Felger & Massarotti show Monday afternoon, and he was asked to provide some insight into the team. “It’s a ton of mudslinging and finger-pointing, and at the end of the day the 2 guys most responsible for bringing 2 world championships here and turning this organization around are gone.” Schilling said. When asked what he thinks about John Henry saying that ownership was not involved in the recent release of private information about Terry Francona and the Sox clubhouse Schilling said, “I think he’s full of ****… and I think he’s disingenuous at best. I think there’s been a lot of that, and I think when Terry comes out and says, very candidly, in the press conference… I didn’t feel like the ownership of this team had my back. That is such a much more powerful statement then the words being used. And then to have someone follow that up with… I was confused by that when he said that… That’s not true. You know this is a group of people who would love everybody to believe that they just sit back and watch baseball ops run the team, it’s not true, they’ve been involved, they’re always involved. When asked if Schilling had even been involved with anything like this Schilling said, “Oh absolutely. Absolutely, I got to see it… I’m not speculating. I got to see it, and experience it and watch it happen.” Schilling added one last jab at ownership when asked about what the perception of the Red Sox organization is he said, “When things like this information, Tito’s marriage stuff, and the medical stuff, and the pills and stuff; when that stuff starts coming from a ‘source’ in the organization, that’s people with an agenda, and people with power in an organization because those things don’t come out, they can’t come out from people other than that. The amount of people that can know enough about that information to make it to be a source is very, very small.”

While Schilling was putting the blame on ownership for the leaking of information, he still maintained that close friend Terry Francona and some of his former teammates were very much responsible for the collapse. When asked if Francona was totally blameless for the collapse Schilling said, “No, absolutely not! … He’s one of the few guys to have the wherewithal, the integrity, to stand up and say this is my fault I couldn’t reach the players… ” Schilling then explored what is the root of all this sludge, an idea that I personally explored in a post right after the collapse, which is the players quitting on this team.

Schilling said he was caught off guard by some of the comments Jon Lester had made earlier in the day, with Lester acknowledging that Francona had lost a voice in the clubhouse. “You’ve got a bunch of grown man admitting that they no longer felt like they listen to the guy in charge, and I don’t understand that.” Schilling said. “… you have a player basically telling you exactly what happened… which means, again I go back to the fact that these players quit. They quit on each other, they quit on the manager, they quit on the organization, they quit on the fans. I think that much is clear.” he added. The comments he’s referring to can be found in the article below.

Schilling has always been known for speaking his mind, and he leveled into ownership and the players during his interview. We all know that Francona lost the clubhouse, and personally I think that we all can accept that fact. From everything that’s come out, it is clear that it was not Francona’s fault for the collapse. It was not ownerships fault for the collapse either, it is all on the players. Yes ownership is completely at fault for leaking information to the public. The information that has come out these past few days should confirm that. But there comes a point when what’s going on in the clubhouse doesn’t matter to you or me. I am very concerned about what’s going on in that clubhouse, and I will continue to voice myself on that. The releasing of information is ridiculous, and the owners deserve to be called out on that. But the players are where the root of all this sludge comes from. That’s where there needs to be a change. If these players decided that they didn’t need to listen to their manager, and they could go and eat fried chicken and have a couple of beers (there’s no way it was just 1 Jon Lester, sorry, but that’s a lie for PR), then something has to be done to re-emphasize that these players are adults making millions of dollars a year to play a game. Jon Lester basically said that these players need a babysitter, that they can’t be trusted to do their jobs. That is just pathetic, when you think about a grown man acting like he is 10 years old. These players want to be able to do whatever they want, as long as that means they don’t have to go to work or be held accountable for their mistakes. They had that chance with Francona, as he would defend his players and their performance on the field ever day he was the manager of the Red Sox. Now that Francona’s gone, you are seeing exactly what the Red Sox didn’t want us to see. The players and the front office did not expect to have this type of information come out, and without Francona to defend his players you are seeing upper management throwing their once great manager under the bus to protect their players. The time for action is now. The owners of this team should stop protecting their players, and start holding those players accountable for their shameful performance on the field. If the owners had simply done this from the beginning, then you wouldn’t have seen the information about Francona come out. Red Sox nation does not care nor want to know about all of these goings ons in the clubhouse or with Francona, we just want to see results. If this information was not released, and the Red Sox were to get rid of Francona for reasons I’ve stated earlier, and then Lackey, Beckett, and Varitek to try to clear up this clique, and the Sox went out and won a World Series, no one would have a bad thing to say about the Sox. The PR games need to stop at Fenway if they want to see a playoff game at Fenway.


Red Sox turmoil heats up after John Henry tries to clear the air

The Boston Red Sox are not having a good offseason. The Red Sox have fired their manager, Terry Francona, there are rumors that Theo Epstein is going to the Chicago Cubs for money and/or prospects, there has been a series of reports about a clique (including Josh Beckett, John Lester, and John Lackey) drinking beer, playing video games, and eating fried chicken in the clubhouse while the Sox were playing, and the latest splurge of demeaning information came on October 12, when Bob Hohler published a story in the Boston Globe absolutely smearing Terry Francona and the players. The article can be found below:

In this article, Hohler explores why Terry Francona may have lost the clubhouse. Hohler says, “Team sources said Francona, who has acknowledged losing influence with some former team leaders, appeared distracted during the season by issues related to his troubled marriage and to his health.”

Think about that for a second. Terry Francona may not have been able to manage the Red Sox because he was dealing with a bad marriage and health problems. Does this seem like the sort of thing you should know? If Terry Francona is having marital problems, I leave that to him and the walls in his house. If it affected his managerial skills, then it’s the Red Sox job to let him go so that both parties can take care of their separate situations. But I do not want to or need to know that he is having that problem, and it is outrages that this information got out! Furthermore, if Francona is addicted to painkillers why should that be disclosed. Hohler says, “Team sources also expressed concern that Francona’s performance may have been affected by his use of pain medication, which he also vehemently denied. Francona said he has taken pain medicine for many years, particularly after multiple knee surgeries. He said he used painkillers after knee surgery last October and used them during the season to relieve the discomfort of doctors draining blood from his knee at least five times.”

I do not care about Francona’s possible drug addiction, except for the fact that I wish him the best of luck in overcoming any possible demons. If he does have a problem, again, that’s his business and the Red Sox were right to get rid of him. As if that wasn’t enough, the Red Sox source adds insult to injury by saying, “While Francona coped with his marital and health issues, he also worried privately about the safety of his son, Nick, and son-in-law, Michael Rice, both of whom are Marine officers serving in Afghanistan.” Yea, maybe Francona couldn’t win a couple of games because he’s busy thinking about he’s son and son-in-law dying over in Afghanistan! Let’s look at the big picture here, it’s time to forget about baseball when human lives are at stake.

The players don’t get off easy either. As I stated earlier, Hohler discusses the player clique of Beckett, Lester, and Lackey. He also shows how lost the clubhouse was even when they were winning. The Red Sox were leading the division in late August, but that appears to just be an illusion of togetherness. The team was just as dysfunctional and distant from each other, management, and upper management at that time.

Hohler explores saying, “As Hurricane Irene barreled toward Boston in late August, management proposed moving up the Sunday finale of a weekend series against Oakland so the teams could play a day-night doubleheader either Friday, Aug. 26, or Saturday, Aug. 27. The reasoning seemed sound: the teams would avoid a Sunday rain out and the dilemma of finding a mutual makeup date for teams separated by 2,700 miles. But numerous Sox players angrily protested. They returned early that Friday from Texas after a demanding stretch in which they had played 14 of 17 games on the road, with additional stops in Minneapolis, Seattle, and Kansas City. The players accused management of caring more about making money than winning, which marked the first time the team’s top executives sensed serious trouble brewing in the clubhouse.”

While it might be true that ownership cares more about making money than they do their players, the players come off as cry babies about a simple doubleheader. News flash, you get paid to play a sport! It’s not like these guys have to go into consecutive brain surgeries, they just have to go out and have fun playing baseball. By the way, the Red Sox swept that doubleheader. They were so tired that they went out and won both games. Regardless of how bad the players or Terry Francona might look in this article, I still have one question.

Why is this information being leaked? That can not be answered without first figuring out who leaked the information. “Red Sox sources” is all that is given during the article. So someone or someones within the Red Sox organization leaked personal information about their former manager, their players, and the overall clubhouse environment. To figure out who within the organization may have done this, you must read into the article a little bit more. Think again for a moment; Terry Francona, Josh Beckett, Jon Lester, John Lackey, and the entire clubhouse are brought to the guillotine and slaughtered by this article. Who’s remaining in the Red Sox organization?

Upper management.

There in lies the secret to the source of all this Red Sox information, and it makes perfect sense. The Red Sox’s front office was receiving heat for not resigning Terry Francona, especially when Francona came out and said he didn’t feel ownership had his back during the year. So the people in upper management, consisting of GM Theo Epstein, Chairmen Tom Werner, President and CEO Larry Lucchino, and Principle Owner John Henry, decided to let the public know that Francona shouldn’t have been brought back because of all these problems he has. They then showed the players as being selfish, arrogant, whiny, spoiled brats, just to get the point across for how hard they had to try to get these players to actually work together as a team. Upper management wanted you to feel bad for all the problems they faced when trying to construct a winning team. And you know what, they’re right! I totally agree with what they did, and I feel very bad for what they had to go through. Dealing with all these prima donna players is ridiculous, and having a manager that is clearly distracted didn’t help. But to then go out, and reveal that information to a reporter so that he can tell the world so that you come off as the good guy, is pathetic. The hero does the right thing even when no one is looking. It shouldn’t matter to those guys in the front office what people think of them, as long as they win. If the Red Sox went on to win the World Series next year, and none of this information was leaked out, then everyone would be talking about what a great job ownership did handling Tito and the collapse. They would be revered for completely changing the atmosphere in the clubhouse, and everyone in Boston, including me, would love what they have done for this city. They decided that wasn’t good enough, so they went and released all this sensitive information to the people. If you’re not convinced it was upper management leaking the information, then consider this. Who would even know of such personal information in the Red Sox organization? Even John Henry admitted, “Not that many I would think.”

John Henry apparently heard Mike Felger of 98.5 the Sports Hub ranting about how ownership was smearing Tito, and he took an exception to it. In a spur of the moment interview, John Henry decided to join the Sports Hub’s Felger & Massarotti October 14, to put all of these rumors to rest. I’ve heard this interview, and I can personally say he wasn’t very convincing. Henry was all over the place, and at some points couldn’t even give a coherent response. According to Henry, Red Sox sources leaked the information, not Tom, Larry, or himself. If that is true, that it was just some ant worker who leaked the information, then what kind of state is the front office in? Not only can John Henry not control his baseball team, but now he can’t even control his own employees that work right under him! John states this, but then says, “When it comes to who’s giving person info from the Red Sox, you can’t really go on a witch hunt and start accusing people,”.

So Henry wants us to believe that someone in the Red Sox organization leaked information not named Larry, Tom, or John, and then he wants us to believe that he can’t go out and find the person responsible because it’s not nice to go witch hunting. He owns the team, he can do whatever he wants! He could just get rid of his whole staff if he wanted to and hire any number of unemployed and capable people just to show that revealing information like this is unacceptable! If you still chose to believe that Henry and ownership did not release the information, then consider this. Why didn’t this information come out sooner? If someone wanted to give out sensitive information such as this, why would they wait until a 2 weeks after the season ended and not 2 days? You gain nothing by waiting, so why not just let it all out when they lose the final game of the year to miss the postseason for a 2nd straight year?

Then the last bit of information that seals the deal, is this. Henry said that he and his companies could not possibly be the ones responsible for leaking the information, because the writer of the article, Bob Hohler, has already said that it was a Red Sox source and not the owners. Henry says this in the first 3:30 of his interview on 98.5, which can be heard below.

Monday morning though, the morning show on 98.5 the Sports Hub of Toucher & Rich revisited this idea. It culminated in an email from Toucher & Rich to Hohler, asking if he had indeed stated that the owners of the Red Sox were not his leads. Hohler emailed back saying, and I’m paraphrasing here, that he has not made any statements since the article was published, and he will leave it a that. That’s it. This one statement via email throws everything that John Henry has been arguing into question. So this leaves 2 possible answers. Either Henry is being fed misinformation, or he’s a liar. I’m gonna go on record saying it was most likely the latter. If Henry’s very first statement during his interview is that Hohler had already stated that the front office was not his lead, and this statement is false, then how much else did Henry say that is not true? Based on everything I have seen, there is virtually no case that the Red Sox’s front office, ownership in-particular, is not responsible for the leaking of personal information about their ex-manager, players, and clubhouse. Through all of this, I agree with ownerships decision to get rid of Terry Francona, and I will most likely agree with any changes they make to the roster. But dragging their players, their ex-manager, into all this sludge, is in the words of John Henry, ” It’s reprehensible.”